Your search “Keep%20the%20death%20penalty%abolished%20in%20the%20ePhilippfines%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e/page/www.deathpenaltyindia.com/img/pages/resources/20e17Statistics.pdf ”

2313 Document(s) 1108 Member(s) 645 Article(s) 15 Page(s)

Document(s)

The Death Penalty in the US in 2016: Year End Report

By Death Penalty Information Center, on 1 January 2016


2016

NGO report


More details See the document

Use of the death penalty fell to historic lows across theUnited States in 2016. States imposed the fewest deathsentences in the modern era of capital punishment, sincestates began re-enacting death penalty statutes in 1973. Newdeath sentences are predicted to be down 39% from 2015’s40-year low. Executions declined more than 25% to theirlowest level in 25 years, and public opinion polls alsomeasured support for capital punishment at a four-decadelow.

  • Document type NGO report
  • Themes list Trend Towards Abolition, Death Penalty, Statistics, Country/Regional profiles,

Document(s)

Romanian : Cum s v face i vocea auzit în cadrul Uniunii Europene: Îndreptar pentru Organiza iile Non-Guvernamentale

By Civil Society Contact Group, on 8 September 2020


2020

Academic report

enenenenenenenenenfres
More details See the document

Acest îndreptar a fost creat în mod special pentru acele ONG-uri care abia i-au început activitatea i pentru membrii acestora, implica i în procesul de formulare a unei strategii europene. Pentru a- i atinge scopul, aceast publica ie ofer informa ii despre UE adaptate pe m sura fiec rei organiza ii, precum i sfaturi legate de activitatea de „lobbying”, ilustrate prin prezentara unor cazuri de campanii la nivelul UE.

Document(s)

Estonian : Enda kuuldavaks tegemine Euroopa Liidus: juhend vabaühendustele

By Civil Society Contact Group, on 8 September 2020


Academic report

enenenenenenenenenfres
More details See the document

Document(s)

Italian : Far sentire la propria voce nell’UE Guida per le ONG

By Civil Society Contact Group, on 8 September 2020


Academic report

enenenenenenenenenfres
More details See the document

Document(s)

German : Einfluss nehmen in der EU: Ein Handbuch für NROs

By Civil Society Contact Group, on 8 September 2020


Academic report

enenenenenenenenenfres
More details See the document

Document(s)

In Defense of the Right to Life: International Law and Death Penalty in the Philippines

By Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines , on 1 January 2017


2017

Academic report


More details See the document

This study is a joint collaboration between international law expert Dr Christopher Ward SC, Senior Counsel of the New South Wales Bar and Adjunct Professor of the Australian National University, and the Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines.

  • Document type Academic report
  • Themes list International law, Death Penalty, Country/Regional profiles,

Document(s)

Death sentences and executions in 2016

By Amnesty International, on 1 January 2017


NGO report

fres
More details See the document

This report covers the judicial use of the death penalty for the period January to December 2016. As in previous years, information is collected from a variety of sources, including: official figures; information from individuals sentenced to death and their families and representatives; reporting by other civil society organizations; and media reports. Amnesty International reports only on executions, death sentences and other aspects of the use of the death penalty, such as commutations and exonerations, where there is reasonable confirmation.

Document(s)

Designed to break you: Human Rights Violations in Texas’ Death Row

By The Human Rights Clinic at the University of Texas School of Law, on 1 January 2017


Academic report


More details See the document

The State of Texas stands today as one of the most extensive utilizers of the death penalty worldwide. Consequently, inmate living conditions on Texas’ death row are ripe for review. This report demonstrates that the mandatory conditions implemented for death row inmates by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice(TDCJ) are harsh and inhumane. Particular conditions of relevance include mandatory solitary confinement, a total ban on contact visits with both attorneys and friends and family, substandard physical and psychological health care, and a lack of access to sufficient religious services.

  • Document type Academic report
  • Themes list Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment and Punishment, Death Row Conditions, Death Row Phenomenon, Death Penalty, Country/Regional profiles,

Document(s)

Slovene : Naj se slisi vas glas v EU: Prirocnik za nevladne organizacije

By Civil Society Contact Group, on 8 September 2020


2020

Academic report

enenenenenenenenenfres
More details See the document

Document(s)

German : Einleitung durch die Kontaktgruppe der Europäischen Zivilgesellschaft : Ein Leitfaden für die Zusammenarbeit

By European Union, on 8 September 2020


Academic report

enfr
More details See the document

Das Handbuch ist dafür gedacht, Ihnen einen Überblick über die verschiedenen Sektoren von NGOs zu geben, die sich für BürgerInnenrechte und für das allgemeine Interesse einsetzen und kann Ihnen somit gleichsam als Kompass für die europäische Zivilgesellschaft dienen. Im ersten Teil geben wir Ihnen zunächst einen generellen Einblick in die bereits bestehende Praxis des Dialogs zwischen EU Institutionen und NGOs, die sich über die letzten 20 Jahre hinweg herausgebildet hat. Daran anschließend möchte wir Ihnen die Forderungen der NGOs im Bezug auf die Umsetzung des Paragraphen über den Zivilen Dialog nahebringen, wie er in der neuen Verfassung niedergeschrieben ist. Im zweiten Teil finden Sie einen Überblick über die verschiedenen Politkbereiche, in denen sich die sechs Sektoren in den nächsten 5 Jahren ihrer Amtszeit jeweils engagieren werden. Dieser Teil soll es Ihnen ermöglichen, die Bereiche auszumachen, in denen europäische NGOs für Ihre jeweils spezifische Arbeit im Parlament Expertise anbieten können. Die Werte und Ziele der Kontaktgruppe finden Sie in Teil III. Der Anhang ist eine komplette Kontaktliste der verschiedenen NGOs, die im Rahmen der Kontaktgruppe zusammen kommen.

Document(s)

The Report of the Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission

By The Constitution Project, on 1 January 2016


2016

NGO report


More details See the document

The Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission (Commission) came together shortly after the state of Oklahoma imposed a moratorium on the execution of condemned inmates. In late 2015, Oklahoma executions were put on hold while a grand jury investigated disturbing problems involving recent executions, including departures from the execution protocols of the Department of Corrections. The report of the grand jury, released in May of 2016, was highly critical and exposed a number of deeply troubling failures in the final stages of Oklahoma’s death penalty

  • Document type NGO report
  • Themes list World Coalition Against the Death Penalty, Death Penalty,

Document(s)

Indonesian : Praktek Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia

By Kontras, on 8 September 2020


2020

NGO report

Indonesia


More details See the document

Paper ini merupakan catatan monitoring KontraS terhadap praktek hukuman mati di Indonesia. Indonesia merupakan salah satu negara di dunia yang masih menerapkan hukuman mati dalam aturan pidananya. Padahal, hingga Juni 2006, lebih dari setengah negara-negara di dunia telah menghapuskan praktek hukuman mati baik secara de jure atau de facto. Di tengah kecenderungan global akan moratorium hukuman mati, praktek ini justru makin lazim diterapkan di Indonesia. Paling tidak selama empat tahun berturut-turut telah dilaksanakan eksekusi mati terhadap para orang narapidana. Pro-kontra penerapan hukuman mati ini semakin menguat, karena tampak tak sejalan dengan komitmen Indonesia untuk tunduk pada kesepakatan internasional yang tertuang dalam Kovenan Internasional tentang Hak Sipil dan Politik serta Kovenan Internasional tentang Hak Ekonomi, Sosial dan Budaya.

  • Document type NGO report
  • Countries list Indonesia

Document(s)

Making the Media Work for You

By European Journalism Centre, on 1 January 2015


2015

Arguments against the death penalty


More details See the document
  • Document type Arguments against the death penalty
  • Themes list Public opinion, Networks, Member organizations,

Document(s)

The Proposed Innocence Protection Act Won’t—Unless It Also Curbs Mistaken Eyewitness Identifications

By Margery Malkin Koosed / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002


2002

Article

United States


More details See the document

This article contends that legislatures should adopt measures to assure greater reliability in the eyewitness testimony introduced in capital cases. Erroneous eyewitness identification is one of the most frequent causes of mistaken convictions and executions. Decades ago, the United States Supreme Court crafted due process and right to counsel constitutional doctrines to curb identification procedures that gratuitously enhanced the risk of mistake. While initial interpretations favored a greater judicial role in preventing such abuses, later rulings retreated. Present constitutional rules do not suffice due to the narrowness of their definition and the weakness of the remedial sanctions allotted. The proposed Innocence Protection Act and similar state legislation trust DNA testing to avert mistaken executions. But testing requires biological material that is often not available in capital prosecutions, and so DNA cannot detect all the innocents among those capitally prosecuted. To avert mistaken convictions and executions, legislative reforms need to go beyond DNA, and avert mistakes arising from erroneous eyewitness identifications. Studies show this is one of the most common sources of unjust conviction, and that suchmistakes may well be on the rise. Federal and state legislation should be adopted that provides a stronger curb on suggestive identification practices that gratuitously increase the risk of executing the innocent. The Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads, developed by the American Psychology/Law Society (AP/LS) in 1998, are an appropriate starting point for legislatures (or state courts exercising their supervisory powers or interpreting state constitutional provisions). Adopting such guidelines will reduce the risk of error in capital cases, with little or no expense borne by the states. Further, to assure that these more reliable procedures will be used during capital case investigations and prosecutions, legislatures and courts should, minimally, adopt an exclusionary rule of the type first announced by the United States Supreme.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Innocence,

Document(s)

When Legislatures Delegate Death: The Troubling Paradox Behind State Uses of Electrocution and Lethal Injection and What It Says About Us

By Deborah W. Denno / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002


Article

United States


More details See the document

This article discusses the paradoxical motivations and problems behind legislative changes from one method of execution to the next, and particularly moves from electrocution to lethal injection. Legislatures and courts insist that the primary reason states switch execution methods is to ensure greater humaneness for death row inmates. History shows, however, that such moves were prompted primarily because the death penalty itself became constitutionally jeopardized due to a state’s particular method. The result has been a warped legal “philosophy” of punishment, at times peculiarly aligning both friends and foes of the death penalty alike and wrongly enabling legislatures to delegate death to unknowledgeable prison personnel. This article first examines the constitutionality of electrocution, contending that a modern Eighth Amendment analysis of a range of factors, such as legislative trends toward lethal injection, indicates that electrocution is cruel and unusual. It then provides an Eighth Amendment review of lethal injection, demonstrating that injection also involves unnecessary pain, the risk of such pain, and a loss of dignity. These failures seem to be attributed to vague lethal injection statutes, uninformed prison personnel, and skeletal or inaccurate lethal injection protocols. The article next presents the author’s study of the most current protocols for lethal injection in all thirty-six states where anesthesia is used for a state execution. The study focuses on a number of criteria contained in many protocols that are key to applying an injection, including: the types and amounts of chemicals that are injected; the selection, training, preparation, and qualifications of the lethal injection team; the involvement of medical personnel; the presence of general witnesses and media witnesses; as well as details on how the procedure is conducted and how much of it witnesses can see. The study emphasizes that the criteria in many protocols are far too vague to assess adequately. When the protocols do offer details, such as the amount and type of chemicals that executioners inject, they oftentimes reveal striking errors and ignorance about the procedure. Suchinaccurate or missing information heightens the likelihood that a lethal injection will be botched and suggests that states are not capable of executing an inmate constitutionally. Even though executions have become increasingly hidden from the public, and therefore more politically palatable, they have not become more humane, only more difficult to monitor.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Lethal Injection, Electrocution,

Fiji-EN

on 6 January 2021

2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°117

on 20 November 2020

2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°110

on 20 November 2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°112

on 20 November 2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°113

on 20 November 2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°114

on 20 November 2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°116

on 20 November 2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°115

on 20 November 2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°120

on 20 November 2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°109

on 20 November 2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°119

on 20 November 2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°118

on 20 November 2020

WCADP_Bylaws_FR

on 12 November 2020

2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°111

on 20 November 2020

2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°108

on 20 November 2020

Colombia-ES

on 6 January 2021

2021

Salvador-FR

on 6 January 2021

Salvador-ES

on 6 January 2021

CoteIvoire-FR

on 6 January 2021

Congo-FR

on 6 January 2021

Congo-EN

on 6 January 2021

Colombia-FR

on 6 January 2021

Burundi-FR

on 6 January 2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°107

on 20 November 2020

2020

Burundi-EN

on 6 January 2021

2021

BurkinaFaso-EN

on 6 January 2021

Bolivia-FR

on 6 January 2021

Coalition mondiale contre la peine de mort – Newsletter n°105

on 4 December 2020

2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°105

on 20 November 2020

2020

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°106

on 20 November 2020

Document(s)

Enduring Injustice. The Peristence of Racial Discrimination in the U.S. Death Penalty

By Death Penalty Information Center / Ngozi Ndulue, on 1 January 2020


2020

NGO report

United States


More details See the document
  • Document type NGO report
  • Countries list United States

Document(s)

Appointed but (Nearly) Prevented From Serving: My Experiences as a Grand Jury Foreperson

By Phyllis L. Crocker / Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, on 1 January 2004


2004

Article

United States


More details See the document

I begin this essay with basic information about grand juries, then tell what happened to our grand jury, and conclude by reflecting on what I learned from this experience. My theme is the tension between the grand jury’s independence and the prosecutor’s desire to control it. The lesson I learned, intellectually and emotionally, is the depth and tenacity of the prosecutor’s assumption that he does control, and has the right to control, the grand jury process. I also learned some lessons about being a client, and believing in oneself and one’s principles.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

From Cradle to Coffin: A Report on Child Executions in Iran

By Stop Child Executions / Foreign Policy Center, on 1 January 2009


2009

NGO report


More details See the document

This report aims to briefly highlight the past and present challenges and choices in Iran’s human rights record on juvenile offenders. It considers legal and theological perspectives on key issues as well as presenting case studies on selected individuals whose mistreatment raises serious questions about the injustices faced by young people in the Iranian judicial system. The report offers practical recommendations to the international community as it takes a closer look at the Islamic Republic and its human rights record through the 2010 Universal Periodic Review.

  • Document type NGO report
  • Themes list Juveniles,

Document(s)

Texas Death Penalty Developments in 2010: The Year in Review

By Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, on 1 January 2010


2010

NGO report


More details See the document

Death sentences in Texas have dropped more than 70% since 2003, reaching a historic low in 2010. According to data compiled from news sources and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, juries condemned eight new individuals to death in Texas in 2010. This is the lowest number of new death sentences since the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Texas’ revised death penalty statute in 1976. For preious annual reports on Texas please visit: http://tcadp.org/get-informed/reports/

  • Document type NGO report
  • Themes list Statistics,

Document(s)

Cameroun: NGO Report on the Implementation of the ICCPR

By Gender Empowerment and Development / Association de Lutte contre les Violences faites aux Femmes / Centre for Civil and Political Rights / Solidarité Pour la Promotion des Droits de l’Homme et des Peuples / Association pour la défense de l’homosexualité / Syndicat National des Journalistes du Cameroun, on 1 January 2010


NGO report

fr
More details See the document

Cameroon, with a population of approximately 18 million, has a multiparty system of government, with the current ruling party Cameroon People’s Democratic Movement (CPDM) in power since it was created in 1985. The president retains the power to control legislation or to rule by decree. Although the civilian authorities do generally maintain effective control of the security forces, security forces sometimes act independently of government authority. Authorities arbitrarily arrest and detain citizens for different reasons. Among those arbitrarily arrested and detained are human rights defenders and other activists and persons not carrying government-issued identity cards. There are incidents of prolonged and sometimes incommunicado pretrial detention and infringement on privacy rights. The government restricts freedom of speech, press, assembly, and association, and harasses journalists and human rights defenders. Other problems include widespread official corruption, societal violence, discrimination against women, the trafficking of children and girls, and discrimination against homosexuals. The government restricts worker rights and activities of independent labor organizations. The diverse cultural beliefs and ethnic groups promote to a large extend discrimination against and violations of women and young people, widows and the divorced. This report specifically highlights violations in 2008 and 2009, with a few violations in other years.

Document(s)

Position Paper: Death Penalty under the Palestinian National Authority

By Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, on 1 January 2010


NGO report


More details See the document

This paper describes the international law surrounding the trend towards abolition. It then discusses this in relation to the death penalty in Palestine which has come under criticism from Human Rights NGO’s to provide prisoners with international standards regarding their detention and providing a fair trial.

  • Document type NGO report
  • Themes list Trend Towards Abolition,

Document(s)

Indigenous constitutionalism and the death penalty: The case of the Commonwealth Caribbean

By Margaret A. Burnham / International Journal of Constitutional Law, on 1 January 2005


2005

Article

Antigua and Barbuda


More details See the document

The Commonwealth Caribbean remains an obstinate holdout against the international trend limiting use of the death penalty. The death row population in the region per capita is about four times that of the United States. Widely debated in legal circles for a decade, capital punishment jurisprudence will be affected by the creation of the regional appellate court that was launched in April 2005. Modeled after the European Court of Justice, the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) will assume the constitutional jurisdiction currently exercised by the Judicial Committee of the London-based Privy Council. Critics claim the CCJ was created to undo the constraints on the death penalty decreed by the Privy Council and international human rights tribunals, while proponents maintain that the new court completes the region’s assumption of sovereignty. This article situates the debate in the constitutional history of the independence era, the current regionalization movement, and the interplay between international norms and domestic fundamental rights.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list Antigua and Barbuda

Document(s)

The Pros and Cons of Life Without Parole

By Bent Grover / Catherine Appleton / British Journal of Criminology, on 1 January 2007


2007

Article

United States


More details See the document

The question of how societies should respond to their most serious crimes if not with the death penalty is ‘perhaps the oldest of all the issues raised by the two-century struggle in western civilization to end the death penalty’ ( Bedau, 1990: 481 ). In this article we draw attention to the rapid and extraordinary increase in the use of ‘life imprisonment without parole’ in the United States. We aim to critically assess the main arguments put forward by supporters of whole life imprisonment as a punishment provided by law to replace the death penalty and argue against life-long detention as the ultimate sanction.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Sentencing Alternatives,

Document(s)

Japan’s Secretive Death Penalty Policy: Contours, Origins, Justifications, and Meanings

By David T. Johnson / Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, on 1 January 2006


2006

Article

Japan


More details See the document

The secrecy that surrounds capital punishment in Japan is taken to extremes not seen in other nations. This article describes the Japanese state’s policy of secrecy and explains how it developed in three historical stages: the “birth of secrecy” during the Meiji period (1867 – 1912); the creation and spread of “censored democracy” during the postwar Occupation (1945 – 1952); and the “acceleration of secrecy” during the decades that followed. The article then analyzes several justifications for secrecy that Japanese prosecutors provide. None seems cogent. The final section explores four meanings of the secrecy policy that relate to the sources of death penalty legitimacy, the salience of capital punishment, the nature of Japan’s democracy, and the role and rule of law in Japanese society.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list Japan
  • Themes list Transparency,

Document(s)

Restraints on Death Penalty in Europe: A Circular Process

By Stefano Manacorda / Journal of International Criminal Justice, on 1 January 2003


2003

Article


More details See the document

That the European area is a zone free of capital punishment is the result of a complex process of restraints that has evolved over the last 50 years. Domestic, regional and universal international law, as well as certain components within each level, have influenced each other to produce a dynamic, circular movement towards abolition. Starting from the internal level, restraints on the death penalty rose up to the regional and universal levels, and then descended back down into domestic law. This process, however, has not produced a completely closed circle, and certain countries in Europe retain legislation permitting recourse to the death penalty for certain crimes, especially war crimes and, according to recent interpretations, criminal offences related to terrorist activity. Extradition or other administrative mechanisms of expulsion also illustrate potential disjunctions in the circle, as they may allow persons to be transferred to retentionist countries. Even though the legislative framework has significantly evolved in the last few years, the dominant role played by political evaluations creates new fissures in the abolitionist circle. Only recently have new abolitionist perspectives emerged from the ‘right of interference’ in foreign death penalty cases, which some countries try to exercise when their own nationals are involved.

  • Document type Article
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

Addressing Capital Punishment Through Statutory Reform

By Douglas A. Berman / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002


2002

Article

United States


More details See the document

State legislatures principally have been responsible for the acceptance and evolution (and even sometimes the abandonment) of capital punishment in the American criminal justice system from the colonial and founding eras, through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and now into the twenty-first century. A number of colonial legislative enactments, though influenced by England’s embrace of the punishment of death, uniquely defined and often significantly confined which crimes were to be subject to capital punishment.[1] State legislatures further narrowed the reach of the death penalty through the early nineteenth century as states, prodded often by vocal abolitionists and led by developments in Pennsylvania, divided the offense of murder into degrees and provided that only the most aggravated murderers would be subject to the punishment of death. The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries also saw states, as the product of legislative enactments, move away from mandating death as the punishment for certain crimes by giving juries discretion to choose which defendants would be sentenced to die. Throughout all these periods, statutory enactments have also played a fundamental role in the evolution of where and how executions are carried out.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

WHEN THE FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY IS “CRUEL AND UNUSUAL”

By Michael J. Zydney Mannheimer / The University of Cincinnati Law Review, on 1 January 2006


2006

Article

United States


More details See the document

Recent changes to the way the U.S. Department of Justice decides whether to pursue capital charges have made it more likely that the federal death penalty will be sought in cases in which the criminal conduct occurred within States that do not authorize capital punishment for any crime. As a result, since 2002, five people have been sentenced to death in federal court for conduct that occurred in States that do not authorize the death penalty. This state of affairs is in serious tension with the Eighth Amendment’s proscription against “cruel and unusual punishments.”

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment and Punishment,

Turkish_WD2022_Poster

on 5 August 2022

2022

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°117

on 20 November 2020

2020

Suriname-EN

on 24 July 2023

Suriname-EN

2023

World Coalition Against the Death Penalty_ How to insert gender issues in abolitionist advocacy

on 1 August 2023

World Coalition Against the Death Penalty_ How to insert gender issues in abolitionist advocacy

2023

Coalition mondiale contre la peine de mort_ Glossaire Genre et Peine de mort

on 1 August 2023

Coalition mondiale contre la peine de mort_ Glossaire Genre et Peine de mort

World Coalition Against the Death Penalty_ Gender and Death Penalty Glossary

on 1 August 2023

World Coalition Against the Death Penalty_ Gender and Death Penalty Glossary

ENG_Country Mapping report_Women on Death Row

on 1 August 2023

ENG_Country Mapping report_Women on Death Row

LGBTQIA_ rigths_and_Death_Penalty_World_Day_2023

on 15 August 2023

LGBTQIA_ rigths_and_Death_Penalty_World_Day_2023

2023

Women-and-Death-Penalty-Factsheet_World-Day-2023

on 15 August 2023

Women-and-Death-Penalty-Factsheet_World-Day-2023

Samoa-EN

on 24 July 2023

Samoa-EN

2023

DBA_Rapport CAC 2022 ENG

on 22 August 2023

DBA_Rapport CAC 2022 ENG

2023

CôteIvoire-EN

on 24 July 2023

CôteIvoire-EN

2023

Fiji-EN

on 24 July 2023

Fiji-EN

Ghana_EN

on 24 July 2023

Ghana_EN

Samoa-EN

on 24 July 2023

Samoa-EN

Samoa-EN

on 24 July 2023

Samoa-EN

Samoa-EN

on 24 July 2023

Samoa-EN

2022 World Day Report

on 12 June 2023

2022 World Day Report

2023

Faits_Chiffres2023_FR-v1

on 12 June 2023

Faits_Chiffres2023_FR-v1

FR_WCADP_RapportActivite2023

on 22 August 2023

FR_WCADP_RapportActivite2023

2023

EN_WCADP_2022ActivityReport

on 22 August 2023

EN_WCADP_2022ActivityReport

EN-WCADP_Bylaws2023

on 22 August 2023

EN-WCADP_Bylaws2023

FR_Rapport journée mondiale 2022_Version courte-v1.1

on 12 June 2023

FR_Rapport journée mondiale 2022_Version courte-v1.1

2023

Mobilization kit world day 2023

on 12 June 2023

Mobilization kit world day 2023

Congo-EN

on 24 July 2023

Congo-EN

2023

Facts & Figures – World Day 2023

on 12 June 2023

Facts & Figures – World Day 2023

2023

2023_BROCHURE_FR_8p_V3_BD

on 12 June 2023

2023_BROCHURE_FR_8p_V3_BD

Faits_Chiffres2023_FR-v2

on 12 June 2023

Faits_Chiffres2023_FR-v2

Leaflet World Day 2023

on 12 June 2023

Leaflet World Day 2023

PapuaNewGuinea_EN

on 21 July 2023

PapuaNewGuinea_EN

2023

CentralAfricanRepublic_FR

on 21 July 2023

CentralAfricanRepublic_FR

CentralAfricanRepublic_EN

on 21 July 2023

CentralAfricanRepublic_EN

Zambia_EN

on 21 July 2023

Zambia_EN

Burundi-EN

on 24 July 2023

Burundi-EN

2023

Ghana_EN

on 21 July 2023

Ghana_EN

2023

aunohr-logo-bilingual

on 14 July 2023

aunohr-logo-bilingual

2023

affiche-world-day-21-de

on 10 July 2023

affiche-world-day-21-de

2023

JM2023 Kit de mobilisation FR_v0.3

on 12 June 2023

JM2023 Kit de mobilisation FR_v0.3

2023

affiche-world-day-21-swa

on 10 July 2023

affiche-world-day-21-swa

2023

affiche-world-day-21-it

on 10 July 2023

affiche-world-day-21-it

affiche-world-day-21-lu

on 10 July 2023

affiche-world-day-21-lu

FactsFigures2022_EN_v1.1

on 23 August 2022

2022