Your search “Keep%20ethe%20eDeath%20ePenalty%abolished%20ein%20ethe%20ePhilippfines%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e/page/www.deathpenalty.org/downloads/RadeletDeterrenceStudy20e09.pdf ”

2405 Document(s) 987 Member(s) 653 Article(s) 12 Page(s)

Document(s)

Wrongful Convictions and the Death Penalty Guide

By The Death Penalty Project, on 1 November 2022


2022

NGO report

Fair Trial


More details See the document

One of the most compelling forces behind the evolution of international attitudes towards capital punishment in recent decades has been the increasing recognition of the potential for error in its use – that those states that choose to retain the practice may be taking the lives of innocent individuals. The Death Penalty Project produced this resource on wrongful convictions and the death penalty.

  • Document type NGO report
  • Themes list Fair Trial

Document(s)

From Lynch Mobs to the Killing State : Race and the Death Penalty in America

By Austin Sarat and Charles J. Ogletree, Jr., on 24 August 2023


2023

Book

United States


More details See the document

Since 1976, over forty percent of prisoners executed in American jails have been African American or Hispanic. This trend shows little evidence of diminishing, and follows a larger pattern of the violent criminalization of African American populations that has marked the country’s history of punishment.

In a bold attempt to tackle the looming question of how and why the connection between race and the death penalty has been so strong throughout American history, Ogletree and Sarat headline an interdisciplinary cast of experts in reflecting on this disturbing issue. Insightful original essays approach the topic from legal, historical, cultural, and social science perspectives to show the ways that the death penalty is racialized, the places in the death penalty process where race makes a difference, and the ways that meanings of race in the United States are constructed in and through our practices of capital punishment.

From Lynch Mobs to the Killing State not only uncovers the ways that race influences capital punishment, but also attempts to situate the linkage between race and the death penalty in the history of this country, in particular the history of lynching. In its probing examination of how and why the connection between race and the death penalty has been so strong throughout American history, this book forces us to consider how the death penalty gives meaning to race as well as why the racialization of the death penalty is uniquely American.

  • Document type Book
  • Countries list United States

Document(s)

Initiating Constructive Debate: A Critical Reflection on the Death Penalty in Africa

By Lilian Chenwi / Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, on 1 January 2005


2005

Article


More details See the document

This article aims to show that there is a need for constructive debate on the death penalty in Africa. Considering that the African Commission is encouraging such a debate, the article begins with an examination of its stance on the subject. This is followed by a brief evaluation of the use of the death penalty in Africa, highlighting some areas of concern. The death penalty is then considered from a human rights perspective, focusing mainly on the possibility of relying on constitutional provisions on the right to life and the prohibition of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment to challenge the death penalty.

  • Document type Article
  • Themes list Right to life, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment and Punishment, Mandatory Death Penalty,

Document(s)

Fair Trial Rights and Their Relation to the Death Penalty in Africa

By Lilian Chenwi / International and Comparative Law Quarterly, on 1 January 2006


2006

Article


More details See the document

A fair trial is a basic element of the notion of the rule of law, and the principles of ‘due process’ and ‘the rule of law’ are fundamental to the protection of human rights. At the centre of any legal system, therefore, must be a means by which legal rights are asserted and breaches remedied through the process of a fair trial in court, as the law is useless without effective remedies. The fairness of the legal process has a particular significance in criminal cases, as it protects against human rights abuses. Hence, constitutional due process and elementary justice require that the judicial functions of trial and sentencing be conducted with fundamental fairness, especially where the irreversible sanction of the death penalty is involved.

  • Document type Article
  • Themes list Fair Trial,

Document(s)

The Role of International Law in United States Death Penalty Cases

By Sandra Babcock / Leiden Journal of International Law, on 1 January 2002


2002

Article

United States


More details See the document

The United States has repeatedly failed to notify detained foreign nationals of their rights to consular notification and access under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. In capital cases, US non-compliance with this ratified Treaty has led to litigation by foreign governments and individual lawyers in domestic courts and international tribunals. While these efforts have had mixed results in individual cases, litigation by Mexico, Germany and other actors has led to increased compliance with Article 36, and a growing recognition of the significance of US treaty obligations.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Foreign Nationals,

Document(s)

Poster 2011

on 10 October 2011


2011

Campaigning

World Coalition

Trend Towards Abolition

arfr
More details Download [ pdf - 107 Ko ]

Poster 2011

Document(s)

Dangerousness, Risk Assessment, and Capital Sentencing

By Aletha M. Claussen-Schulza / Psychology, Public Policy and Law / Marc W. Pearceb / Robert F. Schopp, on 1 January 2004


2004

Article

United States


More details See the document

Judges, jurors, police officers, and others are sometimes asked to make a variety of decisions based on judgments of dangerousness. Reliance on judgments of dangerousness in a variety of legal contexts has led to considerable debate and has been the focus of numerous publications. However, a substantial portion of the debate has centered on the accuracy and improvement of risk assessments rather than the issues concerning the use of dangerousness as a legal criterion. This article focuses on whether dangerousness judgments can play a useful role in capital sentencing decisions within the framework of “guided discretion” and “individualized assessment” set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States. It examines the relationship between these legal doctrines and contemporary approaches to risk assessment, and it discusses the potential tension between these approaches to risk assessment and these legal doctrines. The analysis suggests that expert testimony has the potential to undermine rather than assist the sentencer’s efforts to make capital sentencing decisions in a manner consistent with Supreme Court doctrine. This analysis includes a discussion of the advances and limitations of current approaches to risk assessment in the context of capital sentencing.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

The Decline of Juvenile Death Penalty: Scientific Evidence of Evolving Norms

By Valerie West / Jeffrey Fagan / Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, on 1 January 2004


Article

United States


More details See the document

In 2003, the Missouri Supreme Court set aside the death sentence of Christopher Simmons, who was 17 when he was arrested for the murder of Shirley Crook. The Simmons court held that the “evolving standards of decency” embodied in the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments barred execution of persons who committed capital crimes before their 18th birthday. This decision was based in part on the emerging legislative consensus in the states opposing execution of juvenile offenders and the infrequency with which the death penalty is imposed on juvenile offenders. The State sought a writ of certiorari, and the case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court. This article presents results of analyses of empirical data on the use of the death penalty for adolescent homicide offenders in state courts in the U.S. since 1990. The data shows that, since 1994, when death sentences for juvenile offenders peaked, juvenile death sentences have declined significantly. In particular, the decline in juvenile death sentences since 1999 is statistically significant after controlling for the murder rate, the juvenile homicide arrest rate, and the rate of adult death sentences. This downward trend in juvenile death sentences signals that there is an evolving standard in state trial courts opposing the imposition of death sentences on minors who commit capital offenses.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Juveniles,

Document(s)

Mercy By the Numbers: An Empirical Analysis of Clemency and Its Structure

By Michael Heise / Virginia Law Review, on 1 January 2003


2003

Article

United States


More details See the document

Clemency is an extrajudicial measure intended both to enhance fairness in the administration of justice, and allow for the correction of mistakes. Perhaps nowhere are these goals more important than in the death penalty context. The recent increased use of the death penalty and concurrent decline in the number of defendants removed from death row through clemency call for a better and deeper understanding of clemency authority and its application. Questions about whether clemency decisions are consistently and fairly distributed are particularly apt. This study uses 27 years of death penalty and clemency data to explore the influence of defendant characteristics, political factors, and clemency’s structure on clemency decisions. The results suggest that although a defendant’s race and ethnicity did not influence clemency, gender did play a role, as women were far more likely than their male counterparts to receive clemency. Analyses of political and structural factors point in different directions. Political factors such as the timing of gubernatorial and presidential elections and a governor’s lame-duck status did not systematically influence clemency. However, how states structure clemency authority did make a difference. Clemency grants were more likely in states that vest authority in administrative boards than in states that vest authority in the governor. Regionality and time were also important as clemency grants were less likely in southern states and declined after 1984. Overall, these mixed results contribute to a critique that clemency decisions are arbitrary and inconsistent. Thus, important questions regarding fairness that plague earlier aspects of the death penalty process persist to its final stage.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Clemency,

Document(s)

Capital Punishment, the Moratorium Movement, and Empirical Questions: Looking Beyond Innocence Race and Bad Lawyering in Death Penalty Cases

By James R. Acker / Charles A. Lanier / Psychology, Public Policy and Law, on 1 January 2004


2004

Article

United States


More details See the document

This article briefly explores the underpinnings of the contemporary capital punishment moratorium movement and examines executive and legislative responses to calls for a halt to executions, including suggestions for studying the death penalty process. Although most investigations focus on select issues like innocence, ineffective counsel, and race bias, this article suggests that a wide-ranging constellation of issues should be investigated in any legitimate attempt to evaluate the administration of the death penalty. The article canvasses this broader sweep of issues, discusses related research evidence, and then considers the policy implications of conducting such a thorough empirical assessment of the administration of capital punishment in this country.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Moratorium ,

Document(s)

Exploring the Effects of Altitudes Toward the Death Penalty on Capital Sentencing Verdicts

By Kevin O’Neil / Psychology, Public Policy and Law / Marc W. Patry / Steven D. Penrod, on 1 January 2004


Article

United States


More details See the document

Attitudes toward the death penalty are multifaceted and strongly held, but little research outside of the death-qualification literature has focused on the role that such attitudes and beliefs play in jurors’ capital sentencing verdicts. A single item is insufficient to properly measure attitudes toward the death penalty; therefore, a new 15-item, 5-factor scale was constructed and validated. Use of this scale in 11 studies of capital jury decision making found a large effect of general support of the death penalty on sentencing verdicts as well as independent aggravating effects for the belief that the death penalty is a deterrent and the belief that a sentence of life without parole nonetheless allows parole. These effects generally were not completely mediated by, nor did attitudes moderate the effects of, aggravating and mitigating factors.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

Resolution 63/168 – Moratorium on the use of the death penalty

By United Nations General Assembly, on 8 September 2020


2020

International law - United Nations

aresfrruzh-hant
More details See the document

Document(s)

The Shadow of the Gallows: The Death Penalty and the British Labour Government, 1945-51

By Victor Bailey / Law and History Review, on 1 January 2000


2000

Article

United Kingdom


More details See the document

Exactly what went wrong and why is the theme of this article. How and why did the Labour government, despite its massive majority in Parliament and a long-standing commitment to abolition, fail to get rid of the death penalty? Why was this “window of opportunity” to abolish capital punishment shut for another decade and a half? The answers to these questions will be sought primarily in the realm of government and Parliament.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United Kingdom
  • Themes list Public opinion, Public debate,

Document(s)

Resolution 62/149 – Moratorium on the use of the death penalty

By United Nations General Assembly, on 8 September 2020


2020

International law - United Nations

aresfrruzh-hant
More details See the document

Document(s)

Note verbale dated 11 January 2008 from the Permanent Missions to the United Nations of Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, […] and Zimbabwe addressed to the Secretary-General

By United Nations, on 8 September 2020


United Nations report

Afghanistan

Antigua and Barbuda

Bahamas

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Barbados

Botswana

Brunei Darussalam

Central African Republic

China

Comoros

Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Dominica

Egypt

Equatorial Guinea

Eritrea

Eswatini

Ethiopia

Fiji

Grenada

Guinea

Guyana

Indonesia

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Iraq

Jamaica

Japan

Jordan

Kuwait

Lao People's Democratic Republic

Libya

Malaysia

Maldives

Mauritania

Mongolia

Moratorium

Myanmar

Nigeria

Oman

Pakistan

Papua New Guinea

Qatar

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Lucia

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

Solomon Islands

Somalia

Sudan

Suriname

Syrian Arab Republic

Thailand

Tonga

Trinidad and Tobago

Uganda

United Arab Emirates

Yemen

Zimbabwe

aresfrruzh-hant
More details See the document

The Permanent Missions to the United Nations in New York listed below present their compliments to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and have the honour to refer to resolution 62/149, entitled “Moratorium on the use of the death penalty”, which was adopted by the Third Committee on 15 November 2007, and subsequently by the General Assembly on 18 December 2007 by a recorded vote. The Permanent Missions wish to place on record that they are in persistent objection to any attempt to impose a moratorium on the use of the death penalty or its abolition in contravention to existing stipulations under international law, for the following reasons:

Document(s)

Note verbale dated 10 February 2009 from the Permanent Missions to the United Nations of Afghanistan, the Bahamas, […] and Zimbabwe addressed to the Secretary-General

By United Nations, on 8 September 2020


United Nations report

Afghanistan

Bahamas

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Barbados

Botswana

Brunei Darussalam

Central African Republic

Chad

China

Comoros

Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Dominica

Egypt

Equatorial Guinea

Eritrea

Eswatini

Ethiopia

Fiji

Gambia

Grenada

Guinea

Guyana

Indonesia

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Iraq

Jamaica

Japan

Jordan

Kuwait

Lao People's Democratic Republic

Libya

Malaysia

Maldives

Mauritania

Mongolia

Moratorium

Myanmar

Niger

Nigeria

Papua New Guinea

Qatar

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Lucia

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

Solomon Islands

Somalia

Sudan

Suriname

Syrian Arab Republic

Thailand

Tonga

Trinidad and Tobago

Uganda

United Arab Emirates

Yemen

Zimbabwe

aresfrruzh-hant
More details See the document

The Permanent Missions to the United Nations in New York listed below present their compliments to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and have the honour to refer to resolution 62/149, entitled “Moratorium on the use of the death penalty”, which was adopted by the Third Committee on 15 November 2007, and subsequently by the General Assembly on 18 December 2007 by a recorded vote. The Permanent Missions wish to place on record that they are in persistent objection to any attempt to impose a moratorium on the use of the death penalty or its abolition in contravention to existing stipulations under international law, for the following reasons:

Document(s)

Note verbale dated 11 March 2011 from the Permanent Mission of Egypt to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General

By United Nations, on 8 September 2020


United Nations report

Afghanistan

Antigua and Barbuda

Bahamas

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Barbados

Botswana

Brunei Darussalam

Central African Republic

Chad

China

Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Dominica

Egypt

Equatorial Guinea

Eritrea

Eswatini

Ethiopia

Grenada

Guinea

Guyana

Indonesia

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Iraq

Jamaica

Kuwait

Lao People's Democratic Republic

Libya

Malaysia

Moratorium

Myanmar

Niger

Nigeria

Oman

Pakistan

Papua New Guinea

Qatar

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Lucia

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Saudi Arabia

Sierra Leone

Singapore

Solomon Islands

Somalia

Sudan

Syrian Arab Republic

Tonga

Trinidad and Tobago

Uganda

United Arab Emirates

Yemen

Zimbabwe

aresfrruzh-hant
More details See the document

The permanent missions to the United Nations in New York listed below have the honour to refer to General Assembly resolution 65/206, entitled “Moratorium on the use of the death penalty”, which was adopted by the Third Committee on 11 November 2010, and subsequently by the General Assembly on 21 December 2010 by a recorded vote. The permanent missions wish to place on record that they are in persistent objection to any attempt to impose a moratorium on the use of the death penalty or its abolition in contravention of existing stipulations under international law, for the following reasons:

Document(s)

Sources of Variation in Pro-Death Penalty Attitudes in China: An Exploratory Study of Chinese Students at Home and Abroad

By Lening Zhang / Terance D. Miethe / Hong Lu / Bin Liang / British Journal of Criminology, on 1 January 2006


2006

Article

China


More details See the document

This paper examines Chinese students’ attitudes about the death penalty in contemporary China. Drawing upon Western public opinion research on the death penalty, samples of Chinese college students at home and abroad are used to explore the magnitude of their pro-death penalty attitudes and sources of variation in these opinions. Both groups of Chinese students are found to support the death penalty across different measures of this concept. Several individual and contextual factors are correlated with pro-death penalty attitudes, but the belief in the specific deterrent effect of punishments was the only variable that had a significant net effect on these attitudes in our multivariate analysis. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of this study for future research on public opinion about crime and punishment in China.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list China
  • Themes list Public opinion, Public debate,

Document(s)

The Debate Over the Death Penalty in Today’s China

By Zhang Ning / China perpectives, on 1 January 2005


2005

Article

China


More details See the document

Despite the sensitivity of the subject, the death penalty is currently a topic of public discussion among Chinese legal experts who are now openly wondering about its possible abolition. This debate is of interest on three counts. First, it goes hand-in-hand with a retrospective reading of the Chinese penal tradition, highlighting the succession of attempts at modernising criminal law for over a century. It also shows the ever present weight of the Maoist legacy and the contradictions of the present policy, caught between a concern for legality and continuing recourse to exceptional measures. Lastly, legal professionals and theorists alike are engaging in a review—based on specific cases—of the particular features of contemporary Chinese society and culture.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list China
  • Themes list Public debate,

Document(s)

Stuck in the Dark Ages: Supreme Court Decision Making and Legal Developments

By James R.P. Ogloff / Psychology, Public Policy and Law / Sonia R. Chopra, on 1 January 2004


2004

Article

United States


More details See the document

In the latter quarter of the 20th century, the United States Supreme Court has generally refused to narrow the procedural and substantive conditions under which adults may be sentenced to death for capital murder. The current status of social science evidence is briefly reviewed to evaluate the Court’s treatment of 3 specific categories of evidence: The death-qualified jury, prejudicial capital sentencing, and juror comprehension of capital-sentencing instructions. The role of perceptions of public opinion in the perseverance of capital punishment statutes is considered. It appears that the Court, in general, does not place much weight on social science evidence. Suggestions are made for future areas of research and practice for social scientists interested in capital punishment.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

Why Do White Americans Support the Death Penalty?

By Journal of Politics / Alan R. Metelko / Laura Langbein, on 1 January 2003


2003

Article

United States


More details See the document

This article explores the roots of white support for capital punishment in the United States. Our analysis addresses individual-level and contextual factors, paying particular attention to how racial attitudes and racial composition influence white support for capital punishment. Our findings suggest that white support hinges on a range of attitudes wider than prior research has indicated, including social and governmental trust and individualist and authoritarian values. Extending individual-level analyses, we also find that white responses to capital punishment are sensitive to local context. Perhaps most important, our results clarify the impact of race in two ways. First, racial prejudice emerges here as a comparatively strong predictor of white support for the death penalty. Second, black residential proximity functions to polarize white opinion along lines of racial attitude. As the black percentage of county residents rises, so too does the impact of racial prejudice on white support for capital punishment.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Public opinion,

Document(s)

The Death Penalty in the United States: A Crisis of Conscience

By Richard L. Wiener / Craig Haney / Psychology, Public Policy and Law, on 1 January 2004


2004

Article

United States


More details See the document

The articles in this issue discuss many appellate court decisions that turned on due process problems in the guilt and penalty phases of capital murder trials and the troubling role of race in capital prosecutions. Governor Ryan of Illinois cited many of these issues when he declared a moratorium on the death penalty and appointed a blue-ribbon panel to study the prosecution of capital murder in 2000. Governor Ryan commuted the sentences of all Illinois death row inmates in January 2003, in part, because the legislature was unable to address these issues that again appeared in the panel’s report. These issues raise serious questions about the reliability of the capital murder system and recommend a continued public debate about its fairness.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

Guided Jury Discretion in Capital Murder Cases: The Role of Declarative and Procedural Knowledge

By Richard L. Wiener / Psychology, Public Policy and Law / Melanie Rogers / Ryan Winter / Linda Hurt / Amy Hackney / Karen Kadela / Hope Seib / Shannon Rauch / Laura Warren / Ben Morasco, on 1 January 2004


Article

United States


More details See the document

This article analyzes whether state-approved jury instructions adequately guide jury discretion in the penalty phase of first-degree murder trials. It examines Eighth Amendment jurisprudence regarding guided jury discretion, emphasizing the use of “empirical factors” to examine the quality of state-approved instructions. Psychological research and testimony on the topic of the comprehensibility of jury instructions are reviewed. Data from a recently completed simulation with 80 deliberating juries showed that current instructions do not adequately convey the concepts and processes essential to guiding penalty phase judgments. An additional simulation with 20 deliberating juries demonstrated that deliberation alone does not correct for jurors’ errors in comprehension. The article concludes with recommendations for policy and future research.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Fair Trial,

WD2024-Mobilization-Kit-EN

on 13 June 2024

WD2024-Mobilization-Kit-EN

2024

MOBILIZATION KIT World Day Against the Death Penalty 10 October 2024 – 2025 Security and the death penalty

on 12 June 2024

MOBILIZATION KIT World Day Against the Death Penalty 10 October 2024 – 2025 Security and the death penalty

2024

Faits et chiffres-JM2007-EN

on 4 June 2024

Faits et chiffres-JM2007-EN

2024

EN-World-Day-2023-Report-Final-Short-version

on 7 June 2024

EN-World-Day-2023-Report-Final-Short-version

2024

Mobilization Kit – World day 2024

on 13 June 2024

Mobilization Kit – World day 2024

2024

affiche-WC-2024-FR-BD

on 13 June 2024

affiche-WC-2024-FR-BD

Poster World day 2024 – 2025

on 13 June 2024

Poster World day 2024 – 2025

Leaflet World day 2024

on 13 June 2024

Leaflet World day 2024

JM-BROCHURE_FR_V2-BD

on 13 June 2024

JM-BROCHURE_FR_V2-BD

Fiche détaillée-JM2010-EN

on 4 June 2024

Fiche détaillée-JM2010-EN

2024

Guide pédagogique-JM2009-EN

on 4 June 2024

Guide pédagogique-JM2009-EN

AfficheHD-JM2009-EN

on 3 June 2024

AfficheHD-JM2009-EN

2024

Affiche-JM2010-EN

on 3 June 2024

Affiche-JM2010-EN

Kit de mobilisation-JM2010-EN

on 3 June 2024

Kit de mobilisation-JM2010-EN

Poster 2008 EN

on 3 June 2024

Poster 2008 EN

Kit de mobilisation-JM2008-FR

on 3 June 2024

Kit de mobilisation-JM2008-FR

Kit de mobilisation-JM2008-EN

on 3 June 2024

Kit de mobilisation-JM2008-EN

Affiche-JM2007-FR

on 3 June 2024

Affiche-JM2007-FR

Gender Matters Women on death row in the united states

on 17 May 2024

Gender Matters Women on death row in the united states

2024

Rapport Amnesty Indonésien

on 30 May 2024

Rapport Amnesty Indonésien

2024

ACT5079522024SWAHILI

on 30 May 2024

ACT5079522024SWAHILI

Faits et chiffres-JM2013-EN

on 3 June 2024

Faits et chiffres-JM2013-EN

2024

Affiche-JM2011-EN

on 3 June 2024

Affiche-JM2011-EN

Faits et chiffres-JM2009-EN

on 4 June 2024

Faits et chiffres-JM2009-EN

2024

Fiche détaillée-JM2011-EN

on 4 June 2024

Fiche détaillée-JM2011-EN

Fiche détaillée-JM2012-FR

on 4 June 2024

Fiche détaillée-JM2012-FR

Fiche détaillée-JM2012-EN

on 4 June 2024

Fiche détaillée-JM2012-EN

Faits et chiffres-JM2011-EN

on 4 June 2024

Faits et chiffres-JM2011-EN

Faits et chiffres-JM2010-EN

on 4 June 2024

Faits et chiffres-JM2010-EN

Faits et chiffres-JM2010-FR

on 4 June 2024

Faits et chiffres-JM2010-FR

Faits et chiffres-JM2009-FR

on 4 June 2024

Faits et chiffres-JM2009-FR

Affiche-JM2006-EN

on 3 June 2024

Affiche-JM2006-EN

2024

Kit de mobilisation-JM2006-FR

on 3 June 2024

Kit de mobilisation-JM2006-FR

Kit de mobilisation-JM2006-EN

on 3 June 2024

Kit de mobilisation-JM2006-EN

Affiche-JM2005-EN

on 3 June 2024

Affiche-JM2005-EN

Affiche-JM2004-FR (A3)

on 3 June 2024

Affiche-JM2004-FR (A3)

Affiche-JM2004-EN (A4)

on 3 June 2024

Affiche-JM2004-EN (A4)

Affiche-JM2003-EN (A4)

on 3 June 2024

Affiche-JM2003-EN (A4)

Affiche-JM2019-MAL

on 4 June 2024

Affiche-JM2019-MAL

2024

AfficheHD-JM2018-IT

on 4 June 2024

AfficheHD-JM2018-IT

Affiche-JM2014-JAP

on 4 June 2024

Affiche-JM2014-JAP

Affiche-JM2014-ITA

on 4 June 2024

Affiche-JM2014-ITA

JM2024-Kit-Mobilisation-FR

on 13 June 2024

JM2024-Kit-Mobilisation-FR

2024

FR_JM2024_Deterrence_Final

on 9 July 2024

FR_JM2024_Deterrence_Final

2024

Question of the death penalty – Report of the Secretary General

on 3 September 2024

Question of the death penalty – Report of the Secretary General

2024

JM2024-Outil-temoignages-FR

on 6 August 2024

JM2024-Outil-temoignages-FR

2024

Select Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Swahili

on 9 July 2024

Select Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Swahili

2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024_russe

on 9 July 2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024_russe

traductions_affiche-WC-2024_tagalog

on 9 July 2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024_tagalog

Debunking the deterrence theory

on 9 July 2024

Debunking the deterrence theory

Detailed factshett – World Day 2024 & 2025

on 11 July 2024

Detailed factshett – World Day 2024 & 2025

2024

Fiche détaillée – Journée mondiale 2024 & 2025

on 11 July 2024

Fiche détaillée – Journée mondiale 2024 & 2025

Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Lingala

on 15 July 2024

Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Lingala

2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024_yoruba

on 11 July 2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024_yoruba

2024

WD2024-Testimonials-tool-EN

on 6 August 2024

WD2024-Testimonials-tool-EN

2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024-chinois-simplifie

on 9 July 2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024-chinois-simplifie

2024

Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Indonesian

on 24 July 2024

Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Indonesian

2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024-chinois-traditionnel

on 9 July 2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024-chinois-traditionnel

2024

Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – German

on 9 July 2024

Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – German

Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Urdu

on 9 July 2024

Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Urdu

traductions_affiche-WC-2024_arabic

on 9 July 2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024_arabic

22nd World Day Against the Death Penalty – Facts and figures

on 8 July 2024

22nd World Day Against the Death Penalty – Facts and figures

2024

World coalition against the death penalty – Portuguese

on 8 July 2024

World coalition against the death penalty – Portuguese

22e Journée mondiale contre la peine de mort – Faits & chiffres

on 8 July 2024

22e Journée mondiale contre la peine de mort – Faits & chiffres

Select Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Japanese

on 9 July 2024

Select Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Japanese

2024

Select Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Luganda

on 9 July 2024

Select Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Luganda

traductions_affiche-WC-2024_espagnol

on 9 July 2024

traductions_affiche-WC-2024_espagnol

Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Italian

on 9 July 2024

Poster World day against the death penalty 2024 – 2025 – Italian

Document(s)

Urdu : آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020


2020

NGO report

enenenenenenzh-hant
More details See the document

اس رپورٹ کو ترتیب دیتے ہوئے کئی مقدمات کا دوبارہ جائزہ لیا گیا جس سے سزائے موت پر عمل درآمد سے پیدا ہونے والے اصل خطرات ظاہر ہوئے ہیں۔ آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)

Document(s)

Greek : НОВЫЕ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ УГОЛОВНОГО ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА В КИТАЕ

By Пан Дунмэй / Институт изучения России Хэйлунцзянского университета, on 8 September 2020


Article

China


More details See the document

Бурное социально-экономическое развитие КНР в последние годы обусловило изменения, произошедшие в современном китайском обществе, что, в свою очередь, повлекло необходи- мость изменения уголовного законодательства Китая.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list China
  • Themes list International law,

FactsFigures2021_FR_v1.0

on 30 June 2021

2021

FR_Fiche détaillée_WD2021_v1-2

on 1 July 2021

2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°122

on 2 July 2021

2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°124

on 2 July 2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°125

on 2 July 2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°121

on 2 July 2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°125

on 2 July 2021