Your search “Keep%20the%20death%20penalty%abolished%20in%20the%20ePhilippfines%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e/page/www.deathpenalty.org/downloads/RadeletDeterrenceStudy20e09.pdf ”

2407 Document(s) 987 Member(s) 653 Article(s) 12 Page(s)

FR_Fiche détaillée_WD2021_v1-2

on 1 July 2021

2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°122

on 2 July 2021

2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°124

on 2 July 2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°125

on 2 July 2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°121

on 2 July 2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°125

on 2 July 2021

EN_Maldives_World_Day_Tool_Right_to_Representation_Oct 2020

on 10 August 2021

2021

Online_Harassment_Tool

on 10 August 2021

SWA_WD2021_Poster_BD

on 10 June 2021

2021

2_pg_ MALDIVES_EN_BD

on 10 August 2021

2021

WD2021_How-to-Work-With-UN-mechanisms_v5

on 10 August 2021

WD2021_Poster_LINGALA-BD

on 10 August 2021

WD2021-Poster-LUGANDA-BD

on 10 August 2021

WD2021-Poster-TAGALOG-BD

on 10 August 2021

WD2021_Poster_Zarma_BD

on 10 August 2021

WD2021_Poster_Hausa_BD

on 10 August 2021

EN-WCADP_Status2021_v2.0

on 9 September 2021

2021

FR-WCADP-TdR-EvalExt-PaysRisque2021

on 15 June 2021

2021

JPN_WD2021_Poster_BD

on 10 June 2021

2021

Parliamentarians Tool-WD2021

on 10 September 2021

2021

Document(s)

Urdu : آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020


2020

NGO report

enenenenenenzh-hant
More details See the document

اس رپورٹ کو ترتیب دیتے ہوئے کئی مقدمات کا دوبارہ جائزہ لیا گیا جس سے سزائے موت پر عمل درآمد سے پیدا ہونے والے اصل خطرات ظاہر ہوئے ہیں۔ آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)

Document(s)

Indonesian : Delapan kasus lembar (meliputi Cina, India, Indonesia, Jepang, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020


NGO report

enenenenenenzh-hant
More details See the document

Document(s)

Japanese : 八ケースシート(カバー中国、インド、インドネシア、日本、マレーシア、パキスタン、シンガポール、台湾)

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020


NGO report

enenenenenenzh-hant
More details See the document

Document(s)

Tagalog : Eight kaso sheet (sumasakop sa China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan)

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020


NGO report

enenenenenenzh-hant
More details See the document

Document(s)

Thai : แปดแผ่นกรณี (ครอบคลุมถึงจีน, อินเดีย, อินโดนีเซีย, ญี่ปุ่น, มาเลเซีย, ปากีสถาน, สิงคโปร์, ไต้หวัน)

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020


NGO report

enenenenenenzh-hant
More details See the document

ในรายงานฉบับนี้ มีการทบทวนคดีต่างๆ ที่เกิดขึ้นซึ่งสะท้อนให้เห็นอย่างชัดเจนถึงอันตรายร้ายแรงของการใช้โทษประหารชีวิต การตัดสินว่าใครจะถูกประหารและใครที่จะรอด มักไม่ แปดแผ่นกรณี (ครอบคลุมถึงจีน, อินเดีย, อินโดนีเซีย, ญี่ปุ่น, มาเลเซีย, ปากีสถาน, สิงคโปร์, ไต้หวัน)

Colombia-EN

on 7 January 2021

2021

Salvador-EN

on 7 January 2021

CoteIvoire-EN

on 20 January 2021

2021

Document(s)

Death Penalty in India: Annual Statistics Report 2020

By Project 39A, on 1 January 2020


2020

Academic report

India


More details See the document

The ‘Death Penalty in India: Annual Statistics’ attempts to create a comprehensive year-by-year documentation of movements in the death row population in India. The publication tracks important political and legal developments in the administration of the death penalty and the criminal justice system in the year 2020.

  • Document type Academic report
  • Countries list India

Document(s)

Greek : НОВЫЕ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ УГОЛОВНОГО ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА В КИТАЕ

By Пан Дунмэй / Институт изучения России Хэйлунцзянского университета, on 8 September 2020


2020

Article

China


More details See the document

Бурное социально-экономическое развитие КНР в последние годы обусловило изменения, произошедшие в современном китайском обществе, что, в свою очередь, повлекло необходи- мость изменения уголовного законодательства Китая.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list China
  • Themes list International law,

DE_WD2021_Poster_BD

on 10 June 2021

2021

WCADP_MembershipRules_EN

on 9 February 2021

2021

WCADP_MembershipRules_FR

on 9 February 2021

WCADP_DeclarationIntention-FR

on 9 February 2021

WCADP_IntentionStatement-EN

on 9 February 2021

World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°123

on 23 March 2021

2021

Philippines_Brochure2021_FR_v3_BD

on 23 March 2021

Document(s)

Annual report on the death penalty in Iran 2020

By Iran Human Rights (IHR), ECPM (Together Against the Death Penalty), on 4 May 2021


2021

NGO report

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

fa
More details See the document

The 13th annual report on the death penalty by Iran Human Rights (IHR) and ECPM (Together Against the Death Penalty) provides an assessment and analysis of the death penalty trends in 2020 in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

FR_WD2021_Poster_BD

on 9 June 2021

2021

IT_WD2021_Poster_BD

on 10 June 2021

2021

TestimoniesJM_EN_v.1.0

on 4 July 2022

2022

DE_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 7 July 2022

2022

Houssa_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 7 July 2022

IT_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 7 July 2022

LINGALA_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 7 July 2022

Singhala_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 8 July 2022

2022

Singhala_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 8 July 2022

SWA_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 8 July 2022

SWA_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 8 July 2022

Anniversary tool_EN-v1.1bf

on 8 July 2022

Tamil_WD2022_Poster_BD1.0

on 8 July 2022

JPN_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 8 July 2022

LUGANDA_WD2022_Poster_BD1.0

on 8 July 2022

ZHtrad_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 8 July 2022

URDU_WD2022_Poster_BD

on 8 July 2022

EN_World Day 2021 Report_v1.0_final with annexes

on 8 July 2022

Palestine CAT TAHR WCADP PCHR SHAMS

on 21 July 2022

2022

Ethiopia CAT LOI TAHR WCADP

on 21 July 2022

EN-Detailed Factsheet_1.0

on 4 July 2022

2022

TestimoniesJM_EN

on 28 June 2022

2022

FINAL_EN_Parliamentarian Guide_BD

on 7 October 2021

2021

Uganda Death Penalty CEDAW Final revised

on 21 April 2022

2022

WCADP_TDR_StudyCountriesAtRisk-SriLanka2022

on 23 December 2021

2021

an-abolitionist-educational-toolkit

on 15 April 2022

2022

2809872v1_wsdocs_-sentencing-to-death-without-execution-2020

on 15 April 2022

prison-conditions-in-jamaica-2011

on 19 April 2022

2022

TAHR WCADP Philippines Death Penalty UPR

on 19 April 2022

Kenya CAT Death Penalty

on 21 April 2022

2022

Cuba CAT death penalty

on 21 April 2022

Iraq CAT Death Penalty FINAL

on 21 April 2022

Lebanon CEDAW

on 21 April 2022

Qatar ICCPR DP FINAL

on 21 April 2022

Malawi CEDAW Death Penalty FINAL

on 21 April 2022

AHR The Maldives DP CEDAW

on 21 April 2022

AHR Yemen DP CEDAW 2

on 21 April 2022

Uganda UPR Death Penalty Final

on 21 April 2022

Zimbabwe UPR death penalty Final

on 21 April 2022

Cameroon CERD Death Penalty

on 21 April 2022

Iraq CAT Death Penalty FINAL

on 21 April 2022

WD2022Kit de mobilisation_EN_v1

on 9 June 2022

2022

EN_WDPoster2022-BD website

on 9 June 2022

EN_World Day 2021 Report_v1.0_final without annexes

on 10 June 2022

2022

FactsFigures2022_EN_v1.0

on 24 June 2022

2022

BROCHURE_V2_8p_EN_BD

on 24 June 2022

Document(s)

Hindi : आठ मामले शीट (कवर चीन, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, जापान, मलेशिया, पाकिस्तान, सिंगापुर, ताइवान)

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020


2020

NGO report

enenenenenenzh-hant
More details See the document

इस रिपोर्ट संकलन में मामलों की संख्या की समीक्षा की गई है जो स्पष्ट रूप से मौत की सजा को लागू करने के बहुत असली खतरों का प्रदर्शन. आठ मामले शीट (कवर चीन, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, जापान, मलेशिया, पाकिस्तान, सिंगापुर, ताइवान)

Document(s)

Korean : 아시아에서의 치명적 불의 불공정 재판을 멈춰라, 사형집행을 중단하라.

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020


NGO report

enenenenenenenenzh-hant
More details See the document

아시아∙태평양 지역에서는 세계 나머지 모든 곳을 다 합친 것보다 더 많은 사람이 사형을 당한다. 게다가 불공정한 재판을 받고 사형당할 가능성까지 감안하면 사형이 얼마나 부당한 제도인지 명백히 드러난다. 공정한 재판을 받지 못한 채 사형이 집행된 후에는 이를 되돌이킬 방법이 전혀 없다.

Maldives CAT LOIPR TAHR WCADP MDN

on 21 July 2022

2022

Document(s)

Bringing Reliability Back In: False Confessions and Legal Safeguards in the 21st Century

By Steven A. Drizen / Bradley R. Hall / Peter J. Neufeld / Richard A. Leo / Wisconsin Law Review / Amy Vatner, on 1 January 2006


2006

Article

United States


More details See the document

In this Article, we point out the failures of the legal tests governing admissibility of confessions, tracing the historical development of these flawed standards. We propose a new standard that we believe reinvigorates the largely forgotten purpose of the rules—reliability of confession evidence—in part by requiring the electronic recording of custodial interrogations.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

The right to life: A guide to the implementation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights

By Council of Europe / Douwe Korff / Directorate General of Human Rights, on 1 January 2006


Working with...


More details See the document

This Handbook deals with the right to life, as guaranteed byArticle 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights under that article.

  • Document type Working with...
  • Themes list International law,

Document(s)

Criminology: racial discrimination in the administration of the death penalty: the experience of the united states armed forces (1984–2005)

By David C. Baldus / Catherine M. Grosso / Northwestern University School of Law / Richard Newell, on 1 January 2012


2012

Article

United States


More details See the document

This Article presents evidence of racial discrimination in the administration of the death penalty in the United States Armed Forces from 1984 through 2005.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Minorities, Country/Regional profiles,

Document(s)

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 1 January 2020


2020

NGO report


More details See the document

Энэхүү илтгэлийг боловсруулахдаа хэд хэдэн хэргийг тоймлон бичсэн ба тэдгээр нь цаазын ялыг хэрэгжүүлэхийн бодит аюулыг ил тодорхой харуулж байна.

  • Document type NGO report
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

Lapan lembaran kes (meliputi China, India, Indonesia, Jepun, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 1 January 2011


2011

Academic report

enenenenenenzh-hant
More details See the document

Document(s)

Lethal Injustice in Asia: End unfair trials, stop executions

By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 1 January 2011


NGO report

enenenenenenenenzh-hant
More details See the document

More people are executed in the Asia-Pacific region than in the rest of the world combined. Add to this the probability that they were executed following an unfair trial, and the gross injustice of this punishment becomes all too clear.

Document(s)

Ohio’s Death Penalty Statute: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

By Ohio State Law Journal / Kelly L. Culshaw, on 1 January 2002


2002

Article

United States


More details See the document

As of November 2001, 203 men sit on Ohio’s death row. With the executions of Wilford Berry on February 19, 1999, Jay D. Scott on June 14, 2001, and John Byrd, Jr. on February 19, 2002, the death penalty in Ohio is a reality. The capital defense practitioner representing a client at trial or on appeal must be prepared to defend his or her client against that reality. To that end, this article examines the statutory framework within which capital cases are prosecuted with the express purpose of aiding defense practitioners and improving the quality of capital representation in Ohio. This article analyzes both the positive and negative aspects of Ohio’s death penalty statute. To meet its twin objects, practical advice and suggested litigation strategies are intermingled with critical analysis of the law in Ohio.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Legal Representation,

Document(s)

Striving to Eliminate Unjust Executions: Why the ABA’s Individual Rights & Responsibilities Section Has Issued Protocols on Unfair Implementation of Capital Punishment

By Ronald J. Tabak / Ohio State Law Journal, on 8 September 2020


2020

Article

United States


More details See the document

The ABA concluded in 1997 that pervasive unfairness in capital punishment regimes warranted a halt to executions unless all of the systemic problems the ABA identified were corrected. Four years later, with those problems still pervasive, the ABA’s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities issued protocols designed to facilitate the evaluation of the fairness—or lack thereof—of a jurisdiction’s capital punishment system. The protocols are particularly timely because many state legislative bodies are authorizing, or considering authorizing, studies of death penalty implementation. The protocols provide an overview, a list of questions to consider, and recommendations with regard to each topic area they cover. While these are not exhaustive, and are not fully applicable in every death penalty jurisdiction, they should prove invaluable to any group seeking to seriously evaluate the manner in which capital punishment is actually administered today.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

Gendering the Death Penalty: Countering Sex Bias in a Masculine Sanctuary

By Victor L. Streib / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002


2002

Article

United States


More details See the document

American death penalty laws and procedures persistently minimize cases involving female capital offenders. Recognizing some benign explanations for this disparate impact, Professor Streib nonetheless sees the dearth of female death penalty trials, death sentences, and actual executions as signaling sex bias throughout the death penalty system. In this article, he provides data concerning death sentencing and execution patterns and then suggests both substantive and procedural means to address the apparent sex bias. Much more significant, however, is the unique lens for examining the death penalty that is provided by a sex bias analysis. Professor Streib concludes that this perspective unmasks the system’s crime-fighting rhetoric to reveal a macho refuge that masculinizes all who enter therein.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Women,

Document(s)

Should Abolitionists Support Legislative “Reform” of the Death Penalty?

By Carol S. Steiker / Jordan M. Steiker / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002


Article

United States


More details See the document

We assessed the Court’s reformist project on its own terms, asking whether the Court achieved the goals explicit or tolerated, if not invited, the inequalities and capriciousness characteristic of the pre-Furman era. We also argued that, apart from its failure on its own terms, the Supreme Court’s reformist regulation of capital punishment might well have carried an additional unanticipated cost. Whereas abolitionists initially sought judicial regulation of the death penalty as at least a first step towards abolition, judicial reform actually may have helped to stabilize the death penalty as a social practice. We argued that the appearance of intensive regulation of state death penalty practices, notwithstanding its virtual absence, played a role in legitimizing the practice of capital punishment in the eyes of actors both within and outside the criminal justice system, and we pointed to some objective indicators—such as the dramatic decline in the use of executive clemency in the post-Furman era[12] —as support for this thesis. Implicit in Furman and the 1976 foundational cases. Our assessment was not a positive one. Although the reformist approach spawned an extraordinarily intricate and detailed capital punishment jurisprudence, the resulting doctrines were in practical terms largely unresponsive to the underlying concerns for fairness and heightened reliability that had first led to the constitutional regulation of the death penalty. We described contemporary capital punishment law as the worst of all possible worlds. Its sheer complexity led to numerous reversals of death sentences and thus imposed substantial costs on state criminal justice systems. On closer inspection, however, the complexity concealed the minimalist nature of the Court’s reforms.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

The Death Penalty in Ohio: Fairness, Reliability, and Justice at Risk—A Report on Reforms in Ohio’s Use of the Death Penalty Since the 1997 Ohio State Bar Association Recommendations

By S. Adele Shank / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002


Article

United States


More details See the document

The report as presented to the Ohio State Bar Association Council of Delegates in 1997,the OSBA’s recommendations and, where there have been changes in the law since that time, updates reflecting those changes. New information is noted at the conclusion of each section of the report immediately following the OSBA recommendation for that section.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,

Document(s)

The “New Abolitionism” and the Possibilities of Legislative Action: The New Hampshire Experience

By Sarat Austin / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002


Article

United States


More details See the document

Recently, the work of the abolitionist community has shifted from the courts to the legislatures. In this article, Professor Sarat examines the significance of what he calls the “new abolitionism” in the politics of legislation aimed at changing or ending the death penalty. The author describes the new abolitionism in detail and then examines its role in the May 2000 vote of the New Hampshire State Legislature to repeal the death penalty. The author concludes that the focus of the new abolitionism on the practical liabilities of our system of capital punishment makes it possible for legislators to oppose the death penalty whilepresenting themselves as guardians of widely shared values and the integrity and fairness of our legal institutions.

  • Document type Article
  • Countries list United States
  • Themes list Networks,