Your search “Keep%20the%20death%20penalty%abolished%20in%20the%20ePhilippfines%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e%20e/page/www.deathpenalty.org/downloads/RadeletDeterrenceStudy20e09.pdf ”
FR_Fiche détaillée_WD2021_v1-2
on 1 July 2021
2021
World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°122
on 2 July 2021
2021
World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°124
on 2 July 2021
World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°125
on 2 July 2021
World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°121
on 2 July 2021
World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°125
on 2 July 2021
EN_Maldives_World_Day_Tool_Right_to_Representation_Oct 2020
on 10 August 2021
2021
Online_Harassment_Tool
on 10 August 2021
SWA_WD2021_Poster_BD
on 10 June 2021
2021
2_pg_ MALDIVES_EN_BD
on 10 August 2021
2021
WD2021_How-to-Work-With-UN-mechanisms_v5
on 10 August 2021
WD2021_Poster_LINGALA-BD
on 10 August 2021
WD2021-Poster-LUGANDA-BD
on 10 August 2021
WD2021-Poster-TAGALOG-BD
on 10 August 2021
WD2021_Poster_Zarma_BD
on 10 August 2021
WD2021_Poster_Hausa_BD
on 10 August 2021
EN-WCADP_Status2021_v2.0
on 9 September 2021
2021
FR-WCADP-TdR-EvalExt-PaysRisque2021
on 15 June 2021
2021
JPN_WD2021_Poster_BD
on 10 June 2021
2021
Parliamentarians Tool-WD2021
on 10 September 2021
2021
Document(s)
Urdu : آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)
By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020
2020
NGO report
enenenenenenzh-hantMore details See the document
اس رپورٹ کو ترتیب دیتے ہوئے کئی مقدمات کا دوبارہ جائزہ لیا گیا جس سے سزائے موت پر عمل درآمد سے پیدا ہونے والے اصل خطرات ظاہر ہوئے ہیں۔ آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)
- Document type NGO report
- Themes list Networks,
- Available languages Thai : แปดแผ่นกรณี (ครอบคลุมถึงจีน, อินเดีย, อินโดนีเซีย, ญี่ปุ่น, มาเลเซีย, ปากีสถาน, สิงคโปร์, ไต้หวัน)Tagalog : Eight kaso sheet (sumasakop sa China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan)Japanese : 八ケースシート(カバー中国、インド、インドネシア、日本、マレーシア、パキスタン、シンガポール、台湾)Indonesian : Delapan kasus lembar (meliputi Cina, India, Indonesia, Jepang, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)Hindi : आठ मामले शीट (कवर चीन, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, जापान, मलेशिया, पाकिस्तान, सिंगापुर, ताइवान)Lapan lembaran kes (meliputi China, India, Indonesia, Jepun, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)八个案例张(包括中国,印度,印度尼西亚,日本,马来西亚,巴基斯坦,新加坡,台湾)
Document(s)
Indonesian : Delapan kasus lembar (meliputi Cina, India, Indonesia, Jepang, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)
By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020
NGO report
enenenenenenzh-hantMore details See the document
Saat penyusunan laporan ini, sejumlah kasus sudah ditinjau lagi yang secara jelas menunjukkan bahaya nyata penerapan hukuman mati. Delapan kasus lembar (meliputi Cina, India, Indonesia, Jepang, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)
- Document type NGO report
- Themes list Networks,
- Available languages Urdu : آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)Thai : แปดแผ่นกรณี (ครอบคลุมถึงจีน, อินเดีย, อินโดนีเซีย, ญี่ปุ่น, มาเลเซีย, ปากีสถาน, สิงคโปร์, ไต้หวัน)Tagalog : Eight kaso sheet (sumasakop sa China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan)Japanese : 八ケースシート(カバー中国、インド、インドネシア、日本、マレーシア、パキスタン、シンガポール、台湾)Hindi : आठ मामले शीट (कवर चीन, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, जापान, मलेशिया, पाकिस्तान, सिंगापुर, ताइवान)Lapan lembaran kes (meliputi China, India, Indonesia, Jepun, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)八个案例张(包括中国,印度,印度尼西亚,日本,马来西亚,巴基斯坦,新加坡,台湾)
Document(s)
Japanese : 八ケースシート(カバー中国、インド、インドネシア、日本、マレーシア、パキスタン、シンガポール、台湾)
By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020
NGO report
enenenenenenzh-hantMore details See the document
本報告書をまとめるに際し、死刑を適用することが現実に危険であるということを明らかに示す事例を検討した シート(カバー中国、インド、インドネシア、日本、マレーシア、パキスタン、シンガポール、台湾)
- Document type NGO report
- Themes list Networks,
- Available languages Urdu : آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)Thai : แปดแผ่นกรณี (ครอบคลุมถึงจีน, อินเดีย, อินโดนีเซีย, ญี่ปุ่น, มาเลเซีย, ปากีสถาน, สิงคโปร์, ไต้หวัน)Tagalog : Eight kaso sheet (sumasakop sa China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan)Indonesian : Delapan kasus lembar (meliputi Cina, India, Indonesia, Jepang, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)Hindi : आठ मामले शीट (कवर चीन, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, जापान, मलेशिया, पाकिस्तान, सिंगापुर, ताइवान)Lapan lembaran kes (meliputi China, India, Indonesia, Jepun, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)八个案例张(包括中国,印度,印度尼西亚,日本,马来西亚,巴基斯坦,新加坡,台湾)
Document(s)
Tagalog : Eight kaso sheet (sumasakop sa China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan)
By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020
NGO report
enenenenenenzh-hantMore details See the document
Sa pagbuo ng ulat na ito, nirepaso ang ilang kaso na malinaw na nagpapakita ng tunay na panganib sa pagsasagawa ng parusang kamatayan. Eight kaso sheet (sumasakop sa China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan)
- Document type NGO report
- Themes list Networks,
- Available languages Urdu : آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)Thai : แปดแผ่นกรณี (ครอบคลุมถึงจีน, อินเดีย, อินโดนีเซีย, ญี่ปุ่น, มาเลเซีย, ปากีสถาน, สิงคโปร์, ไต้หวัน)Japanese : 八ケースシート(カバー中国、インド、インドネシア、日本、マレーシア、パキスタン、シンガポール、台湾)Indonesian : Delapan kasus lembar (meliputi Cina, India, Indonesia, Jepang, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)Hindi : आठ मामले शीट (कवर चीन, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, जापान, मलेशिया, पाकिस्तान, सिंगापुर, ताइवान)Lapan lembaran kes (meliputi China, India, Indonesia, Jepun, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)八个案例张(包括中国,印度,印度尼西亚,日本,马来西亚,巴基斯坦,新加坡,台湾)
Document(s)
Thai : แปดแผ่นกรณี (ครอบคลุมถึงจีน, อินเดีย, อินโดนีเซีย, ญี่ปุ่น, มาเลเซีย, ปากีสถาน, สิงคโปร์, ไต้หวัน)
By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020
NGO report
enenenenenenzh-hantMore details See the document
ในรายงานฉบับนี้ มีการทบทวนคดีต่างๆ ที่เกิดขึ้นซึ่งสะท้อนให้เห็นอย่างชัดเจนถึงอันตรายร้ายแรงของการใช้โทษประหารชีวิต การตัดสินว่าใครจะถูกประหารและใครที่จะรอด มักไม่ แปดแผ่นกรณี (ครอบคลุมถึงจีน, อินเดีย, อินโดนีเซีย, ญี่ปุ่น, มาเลเซีย, ปากีสถาน, สิงคโปร์, ไต้หวัน)
- Document type NGO report
- Themes list Networks,
- Available languages Urdu : آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)Tagalog : Eight kaso sheet (sumasakop sa China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan)Japanese : 八ケースシート(カバー中国、インド、インドネシア、日本、マレーシア、パキスタン、シンガポール、台湾)Indonesian : Delapan kasus lembar (meliputi Cina, India, Indonesia, Jepang, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)Hindi : आठ मामले शीट (कवर चीन, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, जापान, मलेशिया, पाकिस्तान, सिंगापुर, ताइवान)Lapan lembaran kes (meliputi China, India, Indonesia, Jepun, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)八个案例张(包括中国,印度,印度尼西亚,日本,马来西亚,巴基斯坦,新加坡,台湾)
Colombia-EN
on 7 January 2021
2021
Salvador-EN
on 7 January 2021
CoteIvoire-EN
on 20 January 2021
2021
Document(s)
Death Penalty in India: Annual Statistics Report 2020
By Project 39A, on 1 January 2020
2020
Academic report
India
More details See the document
The ‘Death Penalty in India: Annual Statistics’ attempts to create a comprehensive year-by-year documentation of movements in the death row population in India. The publication tracks important political and legal developments in the administration of the death penalty and the criminal justice system in the year 2020.
- Document type Academic report
- Countries list India
Document(s)
Greek : НОВЫЕ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ УГОЛОВНОГО ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА В КИТАЕ
By Пан Дунмэй / Институт изучения России Хэйлунцзянского университета, on 8 September 2020
2020
Article
China
More details See the document
Бурное социально-экономическое развитие КНР в последние годы обусловило изменения, произошедшие в современном китайском обществе, что, в свою очередь, повлекло необходи- мость изменения уголовного законодательства Китая.
- Document type Article
- Countries list China
- Themes list International law,
DE_WD2021_Poster_BD
on 10 June 2021
2021
WCADP_MembershipRules_EN
on 9 February 2021
2021
WCADP_MembershipRules_FR
on 9 February 2021
WCADP_DeclarationIntention-FR
on 9 February 2021
WCADP_IntentionStatement-EN
on 9 February 2021
World coalition against the death penalty – Newsletter n°123
on 23 March 2021
2021
Philippines_Brochure2021_FR_v3_BD
on 23 March 2021
Document(s)
Annual report on the death penalty in Iran 2020
By Iran Human Rights (IHR), ECPM (Together Against the Death Penalty), on 4 May 2021
2021
NGO report
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
faMore details See the document
The 13th annual report on the death penalty by Iran Human Rights (IHR) and ECPM (Together Against the Death Penalty) provides an assessment and analysis of the death penalty trends in 2020 in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
- Document type NGO report
- Countries list Iran (Islamic Republic of)
- Available languages گزارش ساالنه اعدام در ایران ۲۰۲۰
FR_WD2021_Poster_BD
on 9 June 2021
2021
IT_WD2021_Poster_BD
on 10 June 2021
2021
TestimoniesJM_EN_v.1.0
on 4 July 2022
2022
DE_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 7 July 2022
2022
Houssa_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 7 July 2022
IT_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 7 July 2022
LINGALA_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 7 July 2022
Singhala_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 8 July 2022
2022
Singhala_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 8 July 2022
SWA_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 8 July 2022
SWA_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 8 July 2022
Anniversary tool_EN-v1.1bf
on 8 July 2022
Tamil_WD2022_Poster_BD1.0
on 8 July 2022
JPN_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 8 July 2022
LUGANDA_WD2022_Poster_BD1.0
on 8 July 2022
ZHtrad_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 8 July 2022
URDU_WD2022_Poster_BD
on 8 July 2022
EN_World Day 2021 Report_v1.0_final with annexes
on 8 July 2022
Palestine CAT TAHR WCADP PCHR SHAMS
on 21 July 2022
2022
Ethiopia CAT LOI TAHR WCADP
on 21 July 2022
EN-Detailed Factsheet_1.0
on 4 July 2022
2022
TestimoniesJM_EN
on 28 June 2022
2022
FINAL_EN_Parliamentarian Guide_BD
on 7 October 2021
2021
Uganda Death Penalty CEDAW Final revised
on 21 April 2022
2022
WCADP_TDR_StudyCountriesAtRisk-SriLanka2022
on 23 December 2021
2021
an-abolitionist-educational-toolkit
on 15 April 2022
2022
2809872v1_wsdocs_-sentencing-to-death-without-execution-2020
on 15 April 2022
prison-conditions-in-jamaica-2011
on 19 April 2022
2022
TAHR WCADP Philippines Death Penalty UPR
on 19 April 2022
Kenya CAT Death Penalty
on 21 April 2022
2022
Cuba CAT death penalty
on 21 April 2022
Iraq CAT Death Penalty FINAL
on 21 April 2022
Lebanon CEDAW
on 21 April 2022
Qatar ICCPR DP FINAL
on 21 April 2022
Malawi CEDAW Death Penalty FINAL
on 21 April 2022
AHR The Maldives DP CEDAW
on 21 April 2022
AHR Yemen DP CEDAW 2
on 21 April 2022
Uganda UPR Death Penalty Final
on 21 April 2022
Zimbabwe UPR death penalty Final
on 21 April 2022
Cameroon CERD Death Penalty
on 21 April 2022
Iraq CAT Death Penalty FINAL
on 21 April 2022
WD2022Kit de mobilisation_EN_v1
on 9 June 2022
2022
EN_WDPoster2022-BD website
on 9 June 2022
EN_World Day 2021 Report_v1.0_final without annexes
on 10 June 2022
2022
FactsFigures2022_EN_v1.0
on 24 June 2022
2022
BROCHURE_V2_8p_EN_BD
on 24 June 2022
Document(s)
Hindi : आठ मामले शीट (कवर चीन, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, जापान, मलेशिया, पाकिस्तान, सिंगापुर, ताइवान)
By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020
2020
NGO report
enenenenenenzh-hantMore details See the document
इस रिपोर्ट संकलन में मामलों की संख्या की समीक्षा की गई है जो स्पष्ट रूप से मौत की सजा को लागू करने के बहुत असली खतरों का प्रदर्शन. आठ मामले शीट (कवर चीन, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, जापान, मलेशिया, पाकिस्तान, सिंगापुर, ताइवान)
- Document type NGO report
- Themes list Networks,
- Available languages Urdu : آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)Thai : แปดแผ่นกรณี (ครอบคลุมถึงจีน, อินเดีย, อินโดนีเซีย, ญี่ปุ่น, มาเลเซีย, ปากีสถาน, สิงคโปร์, ไต้หวัน)Tagalog : Eight kaso sheet (sumasakop sa China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan)Japanese : 八ケースシート(カバー中国、インド、インドネシア、日本、マレーシア、パキスタン、シンガポール、台湾)Indonesian : Delapan kasus lembar (meliputi Cina, India, Indonesia, Jepang, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)Lapan lembaran kes (meliputi China, India, Indonesia, Jepun, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)八个案例张(包括中国,印度,印度尼西亚,日本,马来西亚,巴基斯坦,新加坡,台湾)
Document(s)
Korean : 아시아에서의 치명적 불의 불공정 재판을 멈춰라, 사형집행을 중단하라.
By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 8 September 2020
NGO report
enenenenenenenenzh-hantMore details See the document
아시아∙태평양 지역에서는 세계 나머지 모든 곳을 다 합친 것보다 더 많은 사람이 사형을 당한다. 게다가 불공정한 재판을 받고 사형당할 가능성까지 감안하면 사형이 얼마나 부당한 제도인지 명백히 드러난다. 공정한 재판을 받지 못한 채 사형이 집행된 후에는 이를 되돌이킬 방법이 전혀 없다.
- Document type NGO report
- Themes list Fair Trial,
- Available languages Thai : การประหารชีวิตที่อยุติธรรม ในภูมิภาคเอเชีย ยุติการพิจารณาคดีที่ไม่เป็นธรรม ยกเลิกการประหารชีวิตUrdu : یفاصناان کلہم ںیم ایشیا ںیرک متخ توم ےازس ،دنب تامدقم ہنافصنمریغTagalog : NAKAMAMATAY NA KAWALAN NG KATARUNGAN SA ASYA Itigil ang Di Makatarungang paglilitis, Itigil ang PagbitayMongolian : АЗИ ТИВ ДЭХ ЭНЭРЭЛГҮЙ ШУДАРГА БУС ЯВДАЛ Шударга бусaap шүүх явдлыг зогсоож, цаазын ялыг халъяJapanese : 不当に奪われる生命 ~アジアにおける不公正な裁判を止め、 死刑執行の停止を~Hindi : एशिया में घातक अन्याय: समाप्ति अनुचित परीक्षण, सज़ाएँ बंद करोIndonesian : KETIDAKADILAN YANG MEMATIKAN DI ASIA Akhiri peradilan yang tidak adil, hentikan eksekusiLethal Injustice in Asia: End unfair trials, stop executions亚洲的致命不公: 终止不公审判,停止处决
Maldives CAT LOIPR TAHR WCADP MDN
on 21 July 2022
2022
Document(s)
Bringing Reliability Back In: False Confessions and Legal Safeguards in the 21st Century
By Steven A. Drizen / Bradley R. Hall / Peter J. Neufeld / Richard A. Leo / Wisconsin Law Review / Amy Vatner, on 1 January 2006
2006
Article
United States
More details See the document
In this Article, we point out the failures of the legal tests governing admissibility of confessions, tracing the historical development of these flawed standards. We propose a new standard that we believe reinvigorates the largely forgotten purpose of the rules—reliability of confession evidence—in part by requiring the electronic recording of custodial interrogations.
- Document type Article
- Countries list United States
- Themes list Networks,
Document(s)
The right to life: A guide to the implementation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights
By Council of Europe / Douwe Korff / Directorate General of Human Rights, on 1 January 2006
Working with...
More details See the document
This Handbook deals with the right to life, as guaranteed byArticle 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights under that article.
- Document type Working with...
- Themes list International law,
Document(s)
Criminology: racial discrimination in the administration of the death penalty: the experience of the united states armed forces (1984–2005)
By David C. Baldus / Catherine M. Grosso / Northwestern University School of Law / Richard Newell, on 1 January 2012
2012
Article
United States
More details See the document
This Article presents evidence of racial discrimination in the administration of the death penalty in the United States Armed Forces from 1984 through 2005.
- Document type Article
- Countries list United States
- Themes list Minorities, Country/Regional profiles,
Document(s)
By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 1 January 2020
2020
NGO report
More details See the document
Энэхүү илтгэлийг боловсруулахдаа хэд хэдэн хэргийг тоймлон бичсэн ба тэдгээр нь цаазын ялыг хэрэгжүүлэхийн бодит аюулыг ил тодорхой харуулж байна.
- Document type NGO report
- Themes list Networks,
Document(s)
Lapan lembaran kes (meliputi China, India, Indonesia, Jepun, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)
By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 1 January 2011
2011
Academic report
enenenenenenzh-hantMore details See the document
Lapan lembaran kes (meliputi China, India, Indonesia, Jepun, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)
- Document type Academic report
- Themes list Networks,
- Available languages Urdu : آٹھ کیس شیٹ (ڈھکنے کا چین، بھارت، انڈونیشیا، جاپان، ملائیشیا، پاکستان، سنگاپور ، تائیوان)Thai : แปดแผ่นกรณี (ครอบคลุมถึงจีน, อินเดีย, อินโดนีเซีย, ญี่ปุ่น, มาเลเซีย, ปากีสถาน, สิงคโปร์, ไต้หวัน)Tagalog : Eight kaso sheet (sumasakop sa China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan)Japanese : 八ケースシート(カバー中国、インド、インドネシア、日本、マレーシア、パキスタン、シンガポール、台湾)Indonesian : Delapan kasus lembar (meliputi Cina, India, Indonesia, Jepang, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapura, Taiwan)Hindi : आठ मामले शीट (कवर चीन, भारत, इंडोनेशिया, जापान, मलेशिया, पाकिस्तान, सिंगापुर, ताइवान)八个案例张(包括中国,印度,印度尼西亚,日本,马来西亚,巴基斯坦,新加坡,台湾)
Document(s)
Lethal Injustice in Asia: End unfair trials, stop executions
By Amnesty International / Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, on 1 January 2011
NGO report
enenenenenenenenzh-hantMore details See the document
More people are executed in the Asia-Pacific region than in the rest of the world combined. Add to this the probability that they were executed following an unfair trial, and the gross injustice of this punishment becomes all too clear.
- Document type NGO report
- Themes list Fair Trial,
- Available languages Korean : 아시아에서의 치명적 불의 불공정 재판을 멈춰라, 사형집행을 중단하라.Thai : การประหารชีวิตที่อยุติธรรม ในภูมิภาคเอเชีย ยุติการพิจารณาคดีที่ไม่เป็นธรรม ยกเลิกการประหารชีวิตUrdu : یفاصناان کلہم ںیم ایشیا ںیرک متخ توم ےازس ،دنب تامدقم ہنافصنمریغTagalog : NAKAMAMATAY NA KAWALAN NG KATARUNGAN SA ASYA Itigil ang Di Makatarungang paglilitis, Itigil ang PagbitayMongolian : АЗИ ТИВ ДЭХ ЭНЭРЭЛГҮЙ ШУДАРГА БУС ЯВДАЛ Шударга бусaap шүүх явдлыг зогсоож, цаазын ялыг халъяJapanese : 不当に奪われる生命 ~アジアにおける不公正な裁判を止め、 死刑執行の停止を~Hindi : एशिया में घातक अन्याय: समाप्ति अनुचित परीक्षण, सज़ाएँ बंद करोIndonesian : KETIDAKADILAN YANG MEMATIKAN DI ASIA Akhiri peradilan yang tidak adil, hentikan eksekusi亚洲的致命不公: 终止不公审判,停止处决
Document(s)
Making your Voice Heard in the EU: A Guide for NGOs
By Civil Society Contact Group, on 1 January 2006
2006
Working with...
enenenenenenenenenfresMore details See the document
This training handbook was specifically designed for those “newcomer” NGOs and activists that are in the process of establishing a European strategy. It does so by providing tailored-made information on EU institutions, the way European NGOs work, as well as lobbying “tips”, illustrated by examples of EU level campaigns.
- Document type Working with...
- Themes list Networks,
- Available languages Bulgarian : Как гласът ни да бъде чут в ЕС:Наръчник за НПОRomanian : Cum s v face i vocea auzit în cadrul Uniunii Europene: Îndreptar pentru Organiza iile Non-GuvernamentaleEstonian : Enda kuuldavaks tegemine Euroopa Liidus: juhend vabaühendusteleItalian : Far sentire la propria voce nell’UE Guida per le ONGGerman : Einfluss nehmen in der EU: Ein Handbuch für NROsHungarian : Hallassuk hangunkat az EU-ban: útmutató civil szervezeteknekLatvian : Tava balss Eiropas Savieniba: Rokasgramata NVOPortuguese : Faça ouvir A sua voz na União Europeia!Slovene : Naj se slisi vas glas v EU: Prirocnik za nevladne organizacijeFaire Entendre votre voix dans l'UE: Un Guide à l'Usage des ONGHaciéndose oír en la UE: Una Guía para ONG
Document(s)
Ohio’s Death Penalty Statute: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
By Ohio State Law Journal / Kelly L. Culshaw, on 1 January 2002
2002
Article
United States
More details See the document
As of November 2001, 203 men sit on Ohio’s death row. With the executions of Wilford Berry on February 19, 1999, Jay D. Scott on June 14, 2001, and John Byrd, Jr. on February 19, 2002, the death penalty in Ohio is a reality. The capital defense practitioner representing a client at trial or on appeal must be prepared to defend his or her client against that reality. To that end, this article examines the statutory framework within which capital cases are prosecuted with the express purpose of aiding defense practitioners and improving the quality of capital representation in Ohio. This article analyzes both the positive and negative aspects of Ohio’s death penalty statute. To meet its twin objects, practical advice and suggested litigation strategies are intermingled with critical analysis of the law in Ohio.
- Document type Article
- Countries list United States
- Themes list Legal Representation,
Document(s)
Striving to Eliminate Unjust Executions: Why the ABA’s Individual Rights & Responsibilities Section Has Issued Protocols on Unfair Implementation of Capital Punishment
By Ronald J. Tabak / Ohio State Law Journal, on 8 September 2020
2020
Article
United States
More details See the document
The ABA concluded in 1997 that pervasive unfairness in capital punishment regimes warranted a halt to executions unless all of the systemic problems the ABA identified were corrected. Four years later, with those problems still pervasive, the ABA’s Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities issued protocols designed to facilitate the evaluation of the fairness—or lack thereof—of a jurisdiction’s capital punishment system. The protocols are particularly timely because many state legislative bodies are authorizing, or considering authorizing, studies of death penalty implementation. The protocols provide an overview, a list of questions to consider, and recommendations with regard to each topic area they cover. While these are not exhaustive, and are not fully applicable in every death penalty jurisdiction, they should prove invaluable to any group seeking to seriously evaluate the manner in which capital punishment is actually administered today.
- Document type Article
- Countries list United States
- Themes list Networks,
Document(s)
Gendering the Death Penalty: Countering Sex Bias in a Masculine Sanctuary
By Victor L. Streib / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002
2002
Article
United States
More details See the document
American death penalty laws and procedures persistently minimize cases involving female capital offenders. Recognizing some benign explanations for this disparate impact, Professor Streib nonetheless sees the dearth of female death penalty trials, death sentences, and actual executions as signaling sex bias throughout the death penalty system. In this article, he provides data concerning death sentencing and execution patterns and then suggests both substantive and procedural means to address the apparent sex bias. Much more significant, however, is the unique lens for examining the death penalty that is provided by a sex bias analysis. Professor Streib concludes that this perspective unmasks the system’s crime-fighting rhetoric to reveal a macho refuge that masculinizes all who enter therein.
- Document type Article
- Countries list United States
- Themes list Women,
Document(s)
Should Abolitionists Support Legislative “Reform” of the Death Penalty?
By Carol S. Steiker / Jordan M. Steiker / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002
Article
United States
More details See the document
We assessed the Court’s reformist project on its own terms, asking whether the Court achieved the goals explicit or tolerated, if not invited, the inequalities and capriciousness characteristic of the pre-Furman era. We also argued that, apart from its failure on its own terms, the Supreme Court’s reformist regulation of capital punishment might well have carried an additional unanticipated cost. Whereas abolitionists initially sought judicial regulation of the death penalty as at least a first step towards abolition, judicial reform actually may have helped to stabilize the death penalty as a social practice. We argued that the appearance of intensive regulation of state death penalty practices, notwithstanding its virtual absence, played a role in legitimizing the practice of capital punishment in the eyes of actors both within and outside the criminal justice system, and we pointed to some objective indicators—such as the dramatic decline in the use of executive clemency in the post-Furman era[12] —as support for this thesis. Implicit in Furman and the 1976 foundational cases. Our assessment was not a positive one. Although the reformist approach spawned an extraordinarily intricate and detailed capital punishment jurisprudence, the resulting doctrines were in practical terms largely unresponsive to the underlying concerns for fairness and heightened reliability that had first led to the constitutional regulation of the death penalty. We described contemporary capital punishment law as the worst of all possible worlds. Its sheer complexity led to numerous reversals of death sentences and thus imposed substantial costs on state criminal justice systems. On closer inspection, however, the complexity concealed the minimalist nature of the Court’s reforms.
- Document type Article
- Countries list United States
- Themes list Networks,
Document(s)
The Death Penalty in Ohio: Fairness, Reliability, and Justice at Risk—A Report on Reforms in Ohio’s Use of the Death Penalty Since the 1997 Ohio State Bar Association Recommendations
By S. Adele Shank / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002
Article
United States
More details See the document
The report as presented to the Ohio State Bar Association Council of Delegates in 1997,the OSBA’s recommendations and, where there have been changes in the law since that time, updates reflecting those changes. New information is noted at the conclusion of each section of the report immediately following the OSBA recommendation for that section.
- Document type Article
- Countries list United States
- Themes list Networks,
Document(s)
The “New Abolitionism” and the Possibilities of Legislative Action: The New Hampshire Experience
By Sarat Austin / Ohio State Law Journal, on 1 January 2002
Article
United States
More details See the document
Recently, the work of the abolitionist community has shifted from the courts to the legislatures. In this article, Professor Sarat examines the significance of what he calls the “new abolitionism” in the politics of legislation aimed at changing or ending the death penalty. The author describes the new abolitionism in detail and then examines its role in the May 2000 vote of the New Hampshire State Legislature to repeal the death penalty. The author concludes that the focus of the new abolitionism on the practical liabilities of our system of capital punishment makes it possible for legislators to oppose the death penalty whilepresenting themselves as guardians of widely shared values and the integrity and fairness of our legal institutions.
- Document type Article
- Countries list United States
- Themes list Networks,